Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hans Stocker
ParticipantWow, a lot of lovely sunsets above. I love your Plum Pudding, Ruth. Love the contrast between the hillside with the purples and pinks in the sky. I just would like to cut off the little part of the hillside bottom left, and it will be an even more perfect image. I also the masterpieces #905 en #906 by Michael.
A Short Moment
Hans Stocker
ParticipantI thought you was already sure about the circumscribed arc Ariel. No doubt about that one too imo. On your last image the circumscribed halo is quite clear together with the 22 degrees halo. Both are crossed by the parhelic circle. Love it.
Hans Stocker
ParticipantIt has been too long since my last contribution. I still watched for all of your great ones above. Too any to mention, but #236 and #237 by Michael are unique. The return of Holmboe?
Details
November 4, 2022 at 10:19 am in reply to: Kelvin Helmholtz Instability or fun “wave-on-wave” clouds? #553498Hans Stocker
ParticipantI agree with Ramona that there are a couple of definite curls on it, Ruth. It seems that you have a good eye for meringue in the sky;)
And thanks about the calendar. It was quite a surprise for me.
Hans Stocker
ParticipantYou spotetd a great parhelic Ariel. I think you are sure about their classification, so why not post these on the thread for Optical Phenomena? These are very nice to share over there.
October 20, 2022 at 11:14 pm in reply to: Kelvin Helmholtz Instability or fun “wave-on-wave” clouds? #552193Hans Stocker
ParticipantI agree with Ramona. Also for me this is KH Ruth. The typical crests are maybe a bit chaotic, but they are there for sure. I love meringue btw!
Hans Stocker
ParticipantNo problem Ronna, I understand. The cloud structure for KH (or fluctus according to the International Cloud Atlas) is its typical crest. When there is a row of these crests, they are unmistakable. You can search the gallery using the filter and choose “Fluctus (Kelvin Helmholtz)”. You will find lots of examples among which (after some scrolling) also one with one crest. Lots of pleasure with it!
Hans
Hans Stocker
ParticipantHello Ronna, as far as I know there is no minimum number of waves. I have seen very convincing examples of fluctus with just one wave.
Hans
Hans Stocker
ParticipantYour #224 is amazing Michael. It is also free floating for sure. I love the composition and forms.
Fractional
Hans Stocker
ParticipantGlider flying gives great views Duncan.
Nice to meet you here Giuseppe! Great sky over Italy.
Ruth I love all your images with birds. Especially your last pelican. The birds give an extra dimension to this thread.
My last one in this thread was from a long time ago with the horses in the wind on the beach. Here’s another B&W. Did you already check the B&W thread Giuseppe?
Sky Over French Land
Hans Stocker
Participantoops: I see a cockatoo with etc. ……
Hans Stocker
ParticipantYou are right about what a Cb must look like, but as in this case one does not always has a good view on these massive cloud structures. In this case I think you are right that a lot of the approaching Cb is hidden by other clouds in front of it. I go for a yes for a cumulonimbus.
Hans Stocker
ParticipantWell, I am sure what I think about “Not Sure What To Think About This”, Keelin. It is a beauty and I a cockatoo with a twig in its beak. Love it!
Number #223 is true abstract art, Michael, and I like to repeat the great sounding combination of words Keelin used for Hooked by Ruth: it gives a falling feeling.Floating, Not Falling
Hans Stocker
ParticipantGreat constellation, Duncan. Impossible to wipe it from my screen, Kathy😊.
A Poor Attempt to Cut One LineHans Stocker
ParticipantNice mamma and composition in #1311, Michael.
Wild Sky
-
AuthorPosts